"Smart street design can eliminate many of the traffic problems anticipated by alternative mode elements like bike lanes" from http://www.citylab.com/cityfixer/2014/09/when-adding-bike-lanes-actually-reduces-traffic-delays/379623/
Thursday, March 31, 2016
Wednesday, March 30, 2016
Thursday, March 24, 2016
Tuesday, March 22, 2016
Monday, March 21, 2016
Testing walkability
The quarter mile or 5 minute walk discussion - how useful is this definition?
http://www.originalgreen.org/blog/walk-appeal.html
http://www.originalgreen.org/blog/walk-appeal-measurables.html
- view changes;
- street enclosure;
- windows of view;
- shelter;
- goals in the middle distance (view points);
- turning the corner.
http://www.originalgreen.org/blog/walk-appeal-immeasurables.html
- people on the street;
- lovable things along the way;
- the magic of the city;
- safety;
- nature;
- time, weather, and burdens;
- sound.
Thursday, March 17, 2016
The question of heritage
On one hand, there is preservation architecture with the goal of "doing it correctly" - preserving the original design intent, and outward appearance of a building.
On the other is Vancouver, dealing with issues around heritage and what exactly to preserve. Does it preserve its visual look with signs or this?
But what does one preserve? In a speech to council, Vancouver Vanishes used the theory of up-cycling by saying: "older houses like these were once the type that young or lower income families could afford, improve, put a secondary mortgage helper suite in and later trade up, leaving a better house behind, one that honoured the lives and stories of all its previous inhabitants." So there are resources lost - "the developer purchases a house built with the kind of craftsmanship that barely exists today, using natural materials (including first growth wood). It stands empty, sometimes for years, then is demolished, sending tonnes of waste to the landfill, plus concrete, and in many cases its beautiful garden, too."
Good point but as one article asks: "who is willing to take a loss on the sale of their property – if the City could indeed come up with a way to lower land values?" or "who is willing to support the scale of density bonusing or infill required to make retention of the existing house sufficiently attractive?"
According to one news report "roughly 96 per cent of Vancouverites believe heritage buildings need to be preserved and contribute to our sense of place."
"But somebody blew it up, because they could put a much larger house on the property." http://www.vancouversun.com/fight+vanishing+Vancouver/9647882/story.html?__lsa=9aca-04e5
"But somebody blew it up, because they could put a much larger house on the property." http://www.vancouversun.com/fight+vanishing+Vancouver/9647882/story.html?__lsa=9aca-04e5
The goal remains: "to bring together humans and communities through a multifocal and non-discriminatory philosophy that places equal emphasis on all facets of time, all kinds of places, and all types of people" - http://globalurbanist.com/2016/02/23/historic-preservation-essay
Tuesday, March 15, 2016
Monday, March 14, 2016
Wednesday, March 9, 2016
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)